I had a great time last Friday. I didn’t really want to go
and visit one of the local mosques again. I’m not the type who easily makes initial contact with people, but when a friend agreed to go with me—well,
let’s just say that I felt the Holy Spirit tugging at me. I’m glad I did—we had a great time. Sure, the
sermon was about what I expected, except at the end of it, a Muslim leader
stood up and thanked the two guests in the back (that would be me and my
friend) for coming and expressing solidarity with them (referring to the three
Muslim college students shot to death the week before in North Carolina).
We
stayed on for over two hours talking about the Bible and answering questions
about Bible passages. It was a lot different from what I often hear around
church. Too often, the average church member seems to be afraid of Muslims—doesn’t
want to meet them, and (I guess—I’m not sure) thinks they are all somehow
potential terrorists. Or maybe just different. Or maybe they just don’t know
what to say.
The books that are published and read by evangelicals don’t
seem to help much. Take this short excerpt from a review by Doug Howard,
professor at Calvin College in Grand Rapids, Michigan of The Blood of Lambs,
by Kamal Saleem. (The review itself appeared in Books and Culture magazine some time ago):
On Christmas Day 2009, our youngest son, Jay, found himself
on Delta Northwest Airlines Flight 253 from Amsterdam to Detroit. Toward the
end of the flight, Jay's seatmate, a Nigerian Muslim about his age named Umar
abd al-Muttalib, tried to blow up the plane using a bomb hidden in his
underwear. Reflecting on Jay's experience, and on Umar and the failed efforts
by his father to warn authorities, has helped me clarify my attitude toward
American Christian anti-Islamic literary polemics, including Kamal Saleem's
"memoir, The Blood of Lambs. The book fits the familiar pattern of
reassuring Christians of the superiority of their own faith tradition by
negative comparisons with a dehumanized Islam. But Kamal Saleem's titillating
dance with violence and fame makes the book more complicated and more
uncomfortable than most like it. By embracing the glamorous violence it claims
to abhor, it raises readers' hopes of touching secret human meanings through
it.
I first encountered Kamal Saleem when he appeared at Calvin
College in November 2007. A look at his website told me immediately that he was
not who he said he was. The signature of his deception was his statement that
"in my family was the Grand Wazir of Islam." The term is ridiculous,
a spurious title meant to mislead the innocent with an aura of authority. . . .
Howard is clear, concise, and restrained in his comments; I
just wish that the evangelical community would wake up and listen. I fear there
may not be much chance of that in this country, especially with ISIS stealing
the headlines.
But in all of this confusion, there seems to be a silver
lining—many Muslims in our country—and especially perhaps the second generation
that has gone through our school system (and been challenged to express and
debate ideas) seem to be open to talk.
Jonah didn’t want to go to Nineveh—a violent and powerful
people at the time whose practices might not have differed significantly from
those of ISIS today (I’ll let the history buffs among us comment on that one).
And American Christians—too often we don’t even want to visit our Muslim
friends and sit down to a meal, prepared at their expense.
Don’t know what to say? I didn’t either, except I think I’ve
discovered that the best approach to Muslims is simply to know, love, and
memorize our own Scriptures. When I started quoting Isaiah 53 by heart, one of
them said, ‘what I’ve been told by Christians I know is that they don’t need to
memorize Scripture or make good moral choices—they already have salvation.’
Whether or not somebody really said that to him (it wouldn’t
surprise me, though), my visit showed me again that Muslims are willing to talk
about Jesus.
Are we?
No comments:
Post a Comment